Basketable nets was hit by a grizzly bear. Three games started and two games were hit. The acceptable part is that the Pelicans and grizzly bears that burst them have strong men, while the composition of basketable nets determines that defensive rebound can’t be better. It is not unexpected to be blown by pelicans and grizzly bears. The unacceptable part is that the root cause of the basketable nets’s inability to resist is not a configuration problem. Even in their so-called defensive advantages (such as defense and relieve a Garrison), they are also blown up. Their first five-member group — Simmons, Owen, O’Neal, Durant, Clarkston — according to the configuration of defense, the result is three games finished, the defensive efficiency of this lineup is 126.3. If this lineup is not good at defense, Simmons will have no need to start.
Indeed, Morant hit 4 three points, Bain blasted away, and threw back the three points lost in the first three games. These luck factors influenced the game result to some extent. But this is not enough to explain why basketable nets lost 138.5 points in one hundred rounds. Morant and Bain each scored 38 points, and they also needed 7 assists. Compared with the defense of the Lone Ranger against the grizzly bear two days ago, basketable nets is that he did a poor job, but in terms of defense resources, the Lone Ranger does not have much advantage over basketable nets, then it is clear where the problem lies.
Why did the Lone Ranger take it when he met the grizzly bear?
The Lone Ranger’s “grinding” strength made the grizzly bear panic. The Lone Ranger does not push the rhythm, focuses on protecting the rebound, has reasonable attack choices, and has efficient shooting without mistakes. These are all the annoying keywords of the grizzly bear, as if the Tai Chi master has removed the power of the wrestler.
However, these are all general impressions. If you break it carefully, the Lone Ranger is not big in size and the talent is not good enough. It is not easy to resist when you meet a grizzly bear. However, the Lone Ranger was able to fight for the past five times, limiting the attack efficiency of the grizzly bear to below 102 (101,100,85.9,93.8,94.1). Obviously, it was not possible without some means.
What is the method of Lone Ranger?
Three simple sentences:
Anti-blocking and disassembly efforts, not easy to be ashamed;
The weak side should shrink to the strong side in advance and pile people in the paint area;
Do a good job of rotation to protect the backboard.
Although these three sentences are simple, it takes some effort to really achieve them. After all, basketable nets can’t do it.
Basketable nets where is the mistake of preventing Morant?
At present, there are two special ways to prevent Moran in the Rivers and Lakes:
First, take it back, wrap it around and prevent it from being removed, and give it a jump shot;
The second is to punch out the ball.
These two ideas have their own disadvantages. The disadvantages of Idea 2 are relatively easy to understand. All pinch defense may cause less partial defense and more defense. Although the grizzly bear has ordinary space, it has strong ability to front panel, and the pinch will easily lead to the explosion of the basket. The disadvantages of Idea 1 are not so easy to understand. It is a common practice to defend against a basket-type defender and give him jump shot Space. Are you really afraid of Morant’s jump shot response?
Even if Morant throws a three-point goal of 4 out of 6 like today, it is not enough to explain that it is wrong to take it back. The real disadvantage of this method is that not forcing Morant out of the ball is equal to not limiting his shot output, while backward collection may not limit Morant’s breakthrough. Once he is allowed to enter the paint area, his ability to lag and end is too strong, and he may still get points like cutting melons and vegetables.
Here is a detail-how to prevent molant and Adams from breaking down?
Adams likes to cover Morant one step away from three point line. Generally speaking, this kind of ultra-high position cover is more common in nurkich to Lillard, which is convenient for lilladyan to shoot super far. Morant’s threat in downtown steps was insufficient, but this kind of cover gave Morant acceleration space, allowing him to forcibly overtake the center. In addition, the cover of this position is about equal to the back cover, and it is easy to lose because the collar cannot be surrounded by people. Therefore, to prevent molant and Adams from breaking down, it is necessary to lead the defense personnel to have good communication and cooperation with the center. The latter should remind the former of Adams’s position and prepare to take over molant, force him to slow down, while the former should actively chase back, try to find the opposite position, or prevent Adams from gaining a favorable rebound position.
Judging from the defensive performance of basketable nets, they basically can’t defend at all. If Sharp makes a mistake every time and leaks the middle road every time, it is a problem of ability and experience that he can’t catch Morant every time. Then Simmons eats cover in a solid manner every time and doesn’t chase back after eating cover, that is lack of preparation and attitude.
Look at the control group, how do you defend the Lone Ranger:
In addition, the Lone Ranger Anti-Morant, regardless of whether to clamp or not, will draw a defender from the weak side to the strong side in advance to ensure that there is one more defender in the paint area, with the center, we can stop Morant’s attack basket route and assist the backboard card position, allowing another weak defender to take into account the two positions outside the line.
This kind of defense may expose three point line of the weak side and increase the rotation pressure, but this kind of risk is worth it. The weakness of the grizzly bear is that the shooter outside Bain is not fatal enough, so he cannot afford to gamble. At the same time, the grizzly bear does not have enough points for the weak side to initiate again. Secondly, the Lone Ranger is obviously confident enough in his own rotation ability.
The match between Lone Ranger and grizzly bear on October 23 was actually a replica of the match between the two teams on January 15, but the role of Zairian Williams was changed to Roddy, and the strategy and plot were basically the same. This set of defense is very suitable for teams with good mobility.
In terms of configuration, it is appropriate to copy solo homework basketable nets, but obviously you can’t let Kidd teach Nash to do things.
So, is the different three points in the two matches an excuse for basketable nets?
No, basketable nets was not shot through by the grizzly bear’s fixed-point response, but by “active” three points. In fact, in the whole game, the grizzly bear only scored 3 points at the bottom of the game, and the others came from arch top. Basketable nets can’t keep up with Bain’s no-ball cover. If Bain holds the ball, it can’t be said that it’s just as simple as feeling the ball.
In addition, at the end of the first quarter, Sharp was split and split by Jones. The reason was that Jones came up and fed Clark empty connections first, which made sharp dare not leave Clark, while Jones was sure of sharp mentality, the block is removed directly to the inside, ignoring the existence of sharp, and there is no interference in three consecutive layups/throws. This is the problem of Sharp’s defensive experience, and it is also the problem of insufficient ability to defend people. But why do mills need to lead the opponent to take the ball point? Why didn’t you add troops when the two defenders in the middle road gave nothing? This is the problem of the coaching staff.
So, are all the pots in Nash?
Not really.
So far, even if he only talked about Simmons’s better defense, he was disappointing-in the match with the grizzly bear, Simmons did not show enough convincing defense, there is also no co-defense and no-ball defense, which even makes people feel clumsy in moving. For example, this time, his deceleration inertia is too large, and there is a sense of heavy in the style of large center.
When he was in the position of no-ball defense, he did not show any initiative to swipe the card and complement the position, as if he was a protected veteran.
What makes people more angry is that Simmons’s indifference to the rebound card position seems that these things have nothing to do with him.
Simmons is probably the least active player in basketable nets today. He has a fake ball Defense style, and no ball defense is not as active as Owen and Durant. He took a symbolic defense, everything else has nothing to do with him.
Yogueta is not active in defense. What’s the use of him?
Simmons is much worse than Wei. Wei Shao hit the iron, Wei Shao made mistakes, Wei Shao leaked people, Wei Shao was incompetent and furious, but Wei Shao didn’t give up. Wei Shao had the dignity he wanted to protect. He was trying to change the competition in his way. Wei Shao couldn’t, just because the dishes are objective, there is no choice. The failure of Simmons can be regarded as the result of subjective and objective synergy.
It is not difficult to understand why Simmons was so negative-in three matches, Simmons ate 14 fouls and sent off twice, many of which were cover fouls and card fouls, but his negative attitude rose faster than the foul number. He didn’t adapt to the role closer to the inside, and he was very unhappy. If you are unhappy, you need negative competition, just as if you are unhappy, you can not compete.
For Simmons, what was more unhappy was that he probably found that it was not easy to be a dream Green. Maybe Simmons is an excellent defender, but it does not include internal defense. Maybe Simmons is an excellent passer, but it does not include internal defense. What he could think of was the simplest, the most lazy, the least need to get out of the comfort zone and the most evasive air ball of losing face, which was to turn himself into the second dream-chasing Green. Now, it is not easy, and we have to make efforts, meet challenges and lose face. What if this road doesn’t work?
It doesn’t matter. After all, Call of Duty annually, a handsome face grows on his face, which is more intuitive than his football skills. In addition to the basketball court, Simmons will never lack a stage of power shot. He will just become the most inexplicable existence in NBA history. Before he gave up the end of Trey Yang, he was still a star with distinct characteristics, limitations and strong comprehensive ability. After that, it is difficult for you to see something about the front of basketball from Simmons, and this is only because he has a small heart that needs careful care.
Of course, there is no shortage of money to spoil him.
Yes, I am jealous.