Live broadcast bar, October 15 news the personal radio program of Yang Yi, a well-known basketball commentator, revealed that CBA commentators on various platforms received official warnings, which read: “No matter whether the judgment of the referee is good or bad, whether it is correct or not, it is not allowed to evaluate the judgment of the referee and the level of the referee when explaining and commenting.”
Today’s well-known commentary Su Dong posted a post on his personal microblog, talking about his views on this matter: “I have not said CBA but I have said NBA for many years. Today, I saw that CBA has the so-called “gag order”, so the narrator is not allowed to comment on the referee. It has little to do with me, but it is related to basketball and sports. Some feelings, not to mention holding it. The narrator explained the competition, while the referee, the audience and the staff on the field all belonged to the competition. To the big, every ‘object’ in the picture is in the competition category. Including the distance between the billboard and the terminal line, the thickness of the protective sponge of the basketball bracket, etc. Why can’t the narrator talk about the referee? Of course, if there are excessive remarks, such as personal attacks and insulting words, that is another matter. I don’t think it is necessarily a bad thing if the commentary on the judgment may cause arguments and topics. If the commentary is wrong, tell the narrator frankly. If the narrator is not qualified, you will ask him to say that he will not say it in the future. If it is right, remind the referee to strengthen business learning, it’s no big deal. Mutual promotion and mutual improvement. After all, sports is a kind of competitive entertainment. If the narrator and the game itself become opposite, it will be really embarrassing.”
What do you think of the penalty scale of CBA referees in the new season?