Live broadcast bar, October 15 -yesterday, Yang Yi, a well-known commentator, revealed in the radio program “Yang Yi Kan ball” that the narrator of each platform was officially warned, the content is as follows:
No matter whether the judgment of the referee is good or bad, whether it is correct or not, it is not allowed to evaluate the judgment of the referee and the level of the referee when explaining and commenting.
Today, Ma Jian, a domestic basketball commentator, gave his own opinion on weibo. He wrote: “The quality of CBA basketball league has been upgraded, the premise of connecting the penalty scale goal with the International Basketball Federation is to clarify the direction and goal of the competition. The purpose of the league is to strive for benign brand value growth through marketization, or to choose talents for the national team, which requires the cognition of details and the understanding of penalty. Although they are all based on improving the quality of the league and the competitive level of players, however, in terms of the judgment scale, our managers and referees need to make their own detailed cognition of the “marketization” Business League. What kind of perfect competition process should be presented for the competition, especially in front of audience rating fans, is the core key of the commercial league.
“If the so-called rules were introduced simply and roughly, the so-called embarrassing situation of not allowing commentators to evaluate the referee would appear. On the court, you can comment on the player’s mistakes and the coach’s level, so why can’t you comment on the referee’s penalty? The referee should also be a very important part of the competition. It is obviously more important to guide the competition level than to limit the commenting referee. More in-depth understanding of basketball is more helpful to basketball than simple and rude introduction of embarrassing rules. Happy weekend☕⊙”
What do you think of the penalty scale of CBA referees in the new season?