Live broadcast bar, October 17 today, inspector Zhao FA Bo of Weibo media Ball Ring wrote: “Seeing the report of Xinhua News Agency, after the first two rounds of regular season, CBA referee held a summary meeting, it is a good thing to further unify the standards and standards of the league. The report is as follows:
‘At the end of the first two rounds of the CBA regular season, all CBA referees held a summary meeting on the 15th. Referee lecturer Ma Lijun analyzed the battle cases in four aspects on behalf of the Chinese Basketball Association Commission to further unify the criteria and standards of the league.
On the same day, the Commission pointed out some high-quality sentences and non-sentences that the referee team needed to maintain in the first two rounds, including the judgment of defense invading the attacking cylinder, not the clean cut ball, the contact that did not cause influence, the inevitable contact in the fight and the body deformation of the attacking player forged foul. At the same time, it also points out the obvious violation and foul of missed judgment in the first two rounds, including the contact with the wrist of the ball holder and the contact between the head and legs when cutting the ball.
In addition, the Commission has made clear the circumstances that must be pronounced and that minor contact should not be punished. The cases that must be pronounced include illegal use of hands to make profits, blocking during breakthrough, and serious fall to the ground. Minor contact should not be punished, including slipping when breaking through, physical contact after cap, and contact without affecting the dunk action.
Finally, the Commission stressed that the on-site referee must strictly use standard procedures to operate when starting instant playback to ensure the consistency of operations.’
“
Yang Yi, a well-known commentator, forwarded the microblog and wrote: “It not only encourages confrontation, especially trunk confrontation, but also strictly grasps illegal use of hands to make profits. Simply put, encourage confrontation, but obviously foul must be blown. Isn’t this the punishment method we expect and appeal? Some people say the problem, the referee will adjust, the game will tend to be normal, and the league will develop. This is the direction everyone wants. Is it not good for someone to say the problem?”
What do you think of the penalty scale of CBA referees in the new season?